Healthcare providers utilize a variety of methods to diagnose MASH, including imaging tests, blood tests, and in some cases, a liver biopsy.
To determine the severity of MASH, simple blood and imaging tests are often used. These tests help assess the level of scarring (fibrosis) in your liver.
With proper management, and an early diagnosis, it is possible to potentially reverse the progression of MASH2. At the later stages, liver damage may be irreversible3 and treatment options can become limited.
Your healthcare provider will likely perform one of the following blood tests to determine the severity of MASH:
Liver function tests4 - detects the level of liver enzymes in the blood and can be used to calculate a risk score called FIB-4, which can hightlight liver inflammation.
Fibrosis assessment tests5 - liver scarring tests, which assess the degree of liver scarring and severity of MASH.
MASH and MASLD are updated terms for conditions previously known as NASH (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis) and NAFLD (non-alcoholic fatty liver disease). Similarly, "steatotic liver disease" is the current term for what was once called "fatty liver disease".
Ultrasound, and MRI scans are both used to capture images of the liver and help grade the severity of scarring (fibrosis). The tests below are often used to measure liver stiffness, a typical sign of scarring caused by MASH:
While imaging tests like ultrasound and MRIs, along with blood tests, are most commonly used to assess liver health and screen for potential problems, a liver biopsy has historically been considered a gold standard for diagnosing and determining the severity of MASH8.
A biopsy can provide a detailed microscopic view of the liver tissue, offering information that non-invasive tests may not always capture. This detailed analysis can be important for distinguishing between different types of liver disease and assessing the extent of scarring, which can help guide treatment decisions.
However, it's important to acknowledge that liver biopsies are invasive procedures, carrying inherent risks2. Today, clinicians increasingly rely on using non-invasive tests for diagnosis, due to their improved accuracy and reduced risk.